Talk:Gay Friendly Women

Huff this! ClaimYes 19:10, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

You'll need to add it to VFD then, and have it voted on by the community (Bonner) (Talk) Jun 12, 07:53

Why was delted 83.161.230.43 15:54, November 21, 2009 (UTC)

I wonder what we should do to make this funnier 82.161.223.105 19:40, December 17, 2012 (UTC)

Most urgently, why don't you attack the three separate lists and flesh them out (no pun intended) into actual prose using complete sentences? Also, please select a username; people editing as "82.161.223.105" make us suspicious, like people offering financial advice from a pay phone. Cheers. Spıke Ѧ 19:45 17-Dec-12

will all sexual articles be desexualized? 199.27.76.22 19:28, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

This one hasn't been desexualized. --Mn-z 19:29, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

will it happen eventually —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.27.76.22 (talk • contribs)

Anon, in between trivial queries, you vandalized this wiki at 23:27 UTC last night (or, if you are at the Public Library, perhaps someone using the same seat) and I am very close to banning your address. Please pick a username if you are serious about making a positive contribution. If you are asking about the policy here, it does not call for sexual articles to be desexualized (and new articles on Pregnant Bellies are popping up, as it were, all over the place). I do not know how the policy might change in the future. Spıke Ѧ 15:36 11-Feb-13

It was probably someone getting the same IP 80.101.118.7 15:24, February 14, 2013 (UTC)

OK, I take you at your word. Still, why don't you pick a username and help us write funny stuff? If we know you are a specific user, you will be further protected against consequences of someone using the same IP. Spıke Ѧ 15:41 14-Feb-13