Talk:Evilution
THis is not a comedy, this is anti-creationist sentiment, obviously. Go away! 4.158.60.217 16:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Say "LOL" when Jesus returns, why don't you? You'll regret it get a big kick out of it! 4.158.60.205 22:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
Lighten up and learn to take a joke Uncle J-- 19:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Yup. Okay. Now check out this joke: Cremationism Beezwax 21:40, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Are you a creationist or something? Uncle J 12:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Nope, I'm a pastafarian. But the Flying Spaghetti Monster hates evolution, and therefore it should be made fun of. Of may the FSM strangle you with his Noodly Appendage! Beezwax 23:23, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Repeated Vandalism[edit]
I have a sinking suspicion that there is probably a pretty good chance that there might be a possibility that Serial Blanker, Yes I can shag the Sheep, and Arsehole of the Highest Order are all the same person. Two inch penis and boxy box are likely sock puppets of the same user. This page is vandalized almost every day what the hell is up with that
A tip for the creationists out there: Instead of just rubbishing everything to do with evolution like you're from the Spanish Inquisition or something, try actually making this article funny. It reads more like a damning sermon on the sins of believing anything different to fundamentalist Christianity. Uncyclopedia is a light heared website for people to have a laugh at stuff, not argue over the meaning of life. If it was at all funny, people wouldnt feel the need to edit it. Chill out :-)
Hahahahahaha[edit]
Nice pic, Bob Fleming, it should be added to Intelligent Design and Creationism too lol.
Holy shit[edit]
I can't believe people are still vandalizing this page while semi-protected, it means they'd have to wait several days before they could edit it. I think semiprotection is good enough though, if it were fully protected I wouldn't even be able to edit it. Someone must really hate evolution, these vandals need to get a life.
Consistency[edit]
The only trouble I have with this article is consistency, something like Censorship gives 2 points of view depending on whether it's highlighted or not, in this article it's still slightly biased one-way because of "Evilution leads to evil things such as homosexuality, pansexuality, heterosexuality, bisexuality, masturbation, cunnilingus, fellatio, alcoholism and fun." being there without highlighting. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 21:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Ok i put fun in the censored section --Uncle J 00:37, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Move back to Protection[edit]
Serial blanker is keeping it up, this person really needs to get a life --Uncle J 00:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- You protected it so no one can disagree with you and so you can keep your monopoly on ALL the relgion and science-related articles on here. Be off with you! 4.158.210.101 02:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Irony[edit]
This article is actually more accurate that the wikipedia article :P 59.92.97.113 10:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- It is not! This article is about BS! It should be huffed! Who's with me on this? Beezwax 23:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- *Crickets chirp*
- It is not! This article is about BS! It should be huffed! Who's with me on this? Beezwax 23:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not a bit surprised, really. - Mr. Waxxy man (thanks for the title, THE MAN!)
Read Matt 19:12[edit]
Someone who is THIS fanatical should consider castration as a form of religious devotion. Hey, it beats wiki-vandalization. Heck, my cat's a fanatic and she is getting a castration as a form of devotion to God. She's scheduled on May 14. Happy Weasel 14:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC) Actually, she has been`moved up! I am now celebrating her castration as the glorious event that it is. Saved from carnal sin, she/it is a child of God.69.144.113.218 20:40, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
The black line[edit]
Can someome turn it into a slashed out line instead of a black line. It gets kinda anyyonig to have to re highlight the page every 2 secounds. 76.84.12.144 21:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
I suppose I could do that, although it would look kind of messy if the whole page had it, what does everyone think? --Uncle J 00:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
I think this page should be burned up and shot full of holes. What does everyone else think? Never mind, I'm not interested in what you think 'cause I already know. 4.158.210.101 02:12, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
Aren't you still banned Beezwax? I know its you lol --Uncle J 00:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
WTF?[edit]
I'm assuming some moron from the middle ages wrote this ish? Hey genius, GOD is a fictional character created by oppressed people a long .... time ago. The writings and beliefs are meant as a guide to living a peaceful and dedicated life- a long time ago. People evolve, at least most of us do, and so will our thought processing. I bet you believe science is evil too? Maybe you'd prefer to live like they did back when religions started? I'd can't wait till the after life so I can have a tour of GOD's man-making manufacturing plant, I'm sure I'll see people like you in the "Defective" pile. All religions are based on one truth, people will believe anything someone smarter tells them too.