Talk:Discworld

		This article was nominated for deletion on July 24, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Comment

This article is terrible. A few of the book names are worth keeping, but everything else has got to go. I suggest making it in the style of Discworld. Hell, even Wikipedia's[1] page is funnier than this.--Imp88 02:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Problem is that any individual page out of a discworld novel will almost certainly be funnier than anything we can say about it. Spoofs of good comedy don't work too well. --Kelpan 21:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

I wrote up a new article. It's not very funny and certainly needs a lot of work but it can't really be worse than what was here before. --66.131.180.162 19:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Anonymous Pratchett Fan

This article is really terrible.

Really. I mean it. Any ideas for rewriting? I mean, seriously, a single Discworld book, and I am not even mentionioning Good Omens is funnier than half of Uncyclo. Well, we all know that half of it is crap anyway, but - any suggestions? -Nosferatu5 (Too lazy to login) 24.28.24.222 02:57, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

I suggest deletion of the discoworld section, I mean why is that there. It's a crappy pun and not even continued throughout the section.