Talk:Dick Vitale
Here are my impressions (for what they're worth - I'm not an admin):
Humour - 7 - The article was funny, especially clever and consistent. Specialized audience, though. I think it's hard to pull this kind of humour off.
Concept - 7 - Very clear all the way through. Like a roast, but funnier.
Prose and Formatting - 7 - Good writing style. Organized well. The "baby! was a little bit irritating after awhile.
Images - 9 - Almost slapstick, but okay. Did you actually create them for the article? The specificity of the images was amazing. You get a high score for excellent image construction.
Miscellaneous - 8 - This is a well-conceived, well-constructed article. I ignore the "baby!" after the first three sentences, but I understand they're necessary for consistency. I think you've put a lot of work into this, and it shows. With the possible exception of more silliness, I can't suggest anything further. For the right audience, it will be quite amusing.
Total unofficial score: 38
--Schizo Master 21:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
From Pee Review (redux?)[edit]
Dick Vitale[edit]
Need some help. This is something I want to put on the front page. I need a few more ideas. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 04:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps you're missing an opportunity to wrap the article up with His Happy Destiny, baby! Or connect him to being the point-man for Marklar invasion, baby! More randomness can be funny. I didn't review this article because it didn't seem finished. Hope this helps.--Schizo Master
13:54, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, but what do you mean by that (PS I added another section and pic). --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 03:20, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- I reread the article and I find it much improved. I'd give you a Pee Review, but you don't seem to have a discussion page for this article - something about it not existing yet. If you want, I will post my review here. I just thought you might want someone else to do the official one. Let me know somehow.--Schizo Master 13:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- If you want, you can get someone to review it now. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 02:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- All I can offer is my own review. I don't know anyone else. Do you want me to review it? Let me know.--Schizo Master 13:43, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- If you're good at reviewing, then give me your feedback. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 14:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Humour: | 7 | Pretty Funny |
Concept: | 5 | Not the most important thing or idea |
Prose and formatting: | 1 | Not written like an encyclopedia |
Images: | 9 | HILARIOUS! |
Miscellaneous: | 7 | Pretty Random Stuff |
Final Score: | 29 | Overall good, but "baby" shouldn't be included at the end of every sentence. |
Reviewer: | --Cookies,yum! 22:38, 28 May 2007 (UTC) |