Talk:Antonín Dvořák
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Antonín Dvořák article.
| ||
---|---|---|
|
Article policies |
I was kind of thinking... something in the IRC got me considering. This article is littered with jokes about the Dvorak keyboard, there was an article written in Dvorak that got huffed. I was thinking that having a translation of this page in QWERTY and a translation in Dvorak would be quite amusing. I was thinking essentially of writing this page last night, but in Dvorak. Oh, thanks for adding this to my list; it kind of made my night. --epynephrin 04:47, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hehe, that sounds like it could be pretty cool.. you mean like having DV:Dvorak and QW:Dvorak pages? (And you're welcome :) I'm glad it made you happy..) --Lurgy 15:46, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- Precisely that. Only, the page automatically directs to the DV: version, and there's a link for viewing the QW: As i have seen on a few other pages written in another language or something like that. (I'll come up with an example later, when i'm not at work...) I'm also thinking of making (if i can figure out how) a side-by-side comparison photo of a QWERTY Versus Dvorak piano, the latter being just jumbled up nonsensical keys.
- and last night wasn't so wonderful, so it seemed like you enjoyed my addition enough to call it shared. It was encouraging.--epynephrin 16:46, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- well sounds good to me :) go for it? --Lurgy 00:15, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Um. Eventually. Problem is that I'm lazy... I did post a Dvorak Piano!--epynephrin 00:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- Hehe. Meh! --Lurgy 04:45, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you, thank you, thank you! At last I know what key to hit when I see that "O" in the music. My piano teacher will be really impressed! Um ... but what about all the "q"s, where are they? 124.191.48.160 13:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Um. Eventually. Problem is that I'm lazy... I did post a Dvorak Piano!--epynephrin 00:33, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- well sounds good to me :) go for it? --Lurgy 00:15, 18 February 2006 (UTC)