Welcome to the Mother Ship of amateur comedy writing! (Amateur means we don't pay you to do it.)
This is where the original Uncyclopedia wound up. You might as well pick a user name. We have no "partners" that want to sell you stuff. Giving your email simply lets you recover your password; we don't send spam. Uncyclopedians get a talk page, private edit area, and a welcome, maybe, if you actually edit; and we won't de-platform you for your views, if they're funny.
Talk:AOL
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the AOL article.
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Article policies | |
RE:Emptiness[edit]
Nope, but I had to get back to work that day.. I had hoped somebody else would pick up on it -Ne0n
Emptiness[edit]
All of the chapters are empty. Is is supposed to be this way? --
SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 22:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Me too!
- I approve of this anti-AOL article! Huzzah!
Rewrite Huh...[edit]
Hmmm... how abouut Annoying Old Ladies, or Angry Orange Leprochauns or an articl along one of these lines
- i don't know much about AOL culture, but that sounds like a good idea. Multiple AOL pages, with different interpretations and a disambiguation page. There must be enough people around... Soul101
~MAREPENT! 09:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Mission Priority[edit]
This should be on the top of our lists on pages to update! How can Uncyclopedia /not/ have something hilarious about AOL?
Google Search Results[edit]
I think I was hacked... I recognise those search results. Time to delete mah cookies! --Hypodrive 23:06, 6 May 2007 (UTC)