Forum:Please, non-cryptic advice only
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6261 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.
I am the author of mrawr which is obviously not the best page, or an average page, but I hope it shows potential. My advice so far has been "you need a horse for your cart otherwise your horse will be behind the cart and it won't go" and "coherency plz". Obviously, I need to be told. Please flame my article with coherent advice, rather than being hypocritical like the guy who stamped me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dasquirrel (talk • contribs)
- The answer to your problems is held by the raven that lies behind the rocking chair. Do not anger her, lest the black widow grip your heart. --officer designate
Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 15:42, 8 March 2007 (UTC) - 73 -- \o/ 15:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- A quick bit of advice - telling people to do something here will inevitably make them do the opposite. But since we're all well aware of reverse psychology, I suggest you try using Russian Reverse psychology. For example, your query above would become: "In Soviet Russia, my article mrawr will offer non-cryptic advice on YOU!!!" This should get the desired result, often within seconds. -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:14, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- On a more serious note, you can get advice for your article at Uncyclopedia:Pee Review.
Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 18:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC) - On a less serious note, you can get advice for your article at Benson's 3-D House of Pancakes.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:40, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- On a musical note, "ding dong ping pong dum bum blonk." Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:49, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- On a note of caution: "BEWARE! MAY CONTAIN FLESH-EATING NUTS!" -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thanks, seems like pee review is what I needed