Forum:Pee Week 2011
Apparently the Pee Review has been backing up a mite of late, so we all need to fix this. Like, do reviews. And stuff. As an added incentive, however, I'm starting up another Pee Week at Oliphaunte's urging, aiming for the week after next (no, I have no idea what that date might be). Basically, if you're interested, sign up here. In fact, sign up even if you're not, because if you don't, I may just hit you with a 2x4.
Er... just kidding. I think.
But seriously, does that seem reasonable? Etc? ~ 21:54, 31 August 2011
- Definitely. I've been a bit too busy of late but will try to get back into the swing of reviewing regularly next month. Or never do another again. I haven't decided yet. --Black Flamingo 22:26, August 31, 2011 (UTC)
- While I'm more inclined toward the latter option myself, the former would be... er... better, or something.
~ 19:11, 2 September 2011
- Latter good. Pee review bad. Wastes time mine. Oliphaunte like help people though. Paradox cause Oliphaunte to return to this place. Damn paradox. Damn Oliphaunte.
- Also, Oliphaunte think that list of judges would be idea good. Award good too. Positive reinforcement make Oliphaunte happy. Oliphaunte not happy in long time. Damn Oliphaunte. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 01:59, September 3, 2011 (UTC)
- List of the ones who'll be checking, then? Can't we just point to the list of Steel Kidneys; it'll be whoever shows up? Although that might not actually work. o_O
~ 05:34, 3 September 2011 I would also help if I had the time, but exams are just about finished so I should be able to help out. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:58, September 3, 2011 (UTC)
Award
Lyrithya...
You've offered a consequence for NOT participating ... but have offered no reward for doing it. There must be dozens of posibilities! --ShabiDOO 11:55, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
- "Everyone who enters and finishes with a positive score will get a nice template for their userpage.
- The winner will get a bigger, nicer template, and a glowing write-up about their general awesomeness in the UnSignpost."
- ...Although I wouldn't really consider that a reward. --Black Flamingo 13:45, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
- There's a consequence for not participating? Hells, I'unno; I just copied the thing from last year. Oliphaunte seemed to want to actually run the thing, though, so maybe we should just gang up on him and make him figure it out.
~ 15:39, 6 September 2011
- Okay...I have a great idea...whoever does the most in-depth pees, gets to name Lollipop as president of uncyclopedia for life! --ShabiDOO 16:29, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Lyrithya is right, I was pushing her to do it, although not hard enough apparently since she seems to have survived the fall (I'll get you next time. You and your little kitty too). University has started and I think I'm attending the wrong one again. Perhaps it was in Texas....
- Anyways, perhaps the incentive of whoever is the winner could be that they get both the template AND the ability to reverse any non-in-depth review they have in Cajek's list. For example, if they have 10 reviews, but only 9 in-depth, we just take away that review that wasn't good enough, give them the point, and bam, they'll have a perfect score, or whatever. Others who don't need that *cough* BF11 *cough*, can either save it or just get 2 points for one review, or something. Are we even allowed to do that? No? Well then fuck it. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 18:23, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Okay...I have a great idea...whoever does the most in-depth pees, gets to name Lollipop as president of uncyclopedia for life! --ShabiDOO 16:29, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
- How about this: the winner will replace Barack Obama as the rightfully-elected President of the United States. 18:52, September 6, 2011 (UTC)