Forum:New Why? Namespace

Forums: Index > Village Dump > New Why? Namespace

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4232 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

Uh... yeah. Braydie (you gotta love 'em) basically set up a new Namespace, Why?, for making persuasive articles pertaining to both sides of a certain question. I've already made one. I wasn't sure what kind of hype this was getting, so I'm just putting this out there for now. If you've already heard of this, disregard. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

I like it and I hadn't heard about it. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 08:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Cool! Just imagine the possibilites for this... Why?:Carry an ID card, Why?:Bathe in beans and Why?:Aye, for the Geordies. -- Hindleyite Converse 12:46, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Why?:Leave my name in the testimonials. Still have yet to hear a coherent argument from the admins who won't take my name down. --User:Nintendorulez 13:16, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

(petty euroipods related discussion continued...)

Right, if you look now it has a vote for featured Why?. It is not for highlighting on the front page, but on the Why? namespace, you will not be granted CUN either, as I haven't got the powers. --—Braydie 20:15, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, I made my response to the Why? namespace on its talk page.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 23:01, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Heh. --—Braydie 18:33, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

The UN:VWHY is still pretty empty with only few contributors folks.. - It's gneomI 11:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Look here for other whys you may not have found yet, and add them to whatever categories/templates needed. I don't think you need to move them to Why?: though, they probably do just fine where they are. I like the Why did the chicken cross the road ones. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 23:12, 9 Dec 2006

Thanks Spanggg --—Braydie 15:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Spang: So it was this page that ended in my article being moved to the Why? space... --KWild 05:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

I was actually wondering if it was okay to propose a question and answer it in the form of an article at some point. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 08:36, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

I did say that they probably didn't need to be moved, just added to the categories/relevant templates. It might just be me, but I think Why did the chicken cross the road? as an article title looks better than Why?:Did the chicken cross the road? I'm not a big fan of mass renaming of articles into new "namespaces". • Spang • ☃ • talk • 13:46, 11 Dec 2006

I haven't moved any, so it must of been someone else.--—Braydie 14:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Looks like it was The Bard. At least for Why?:Did the chicken cross the road?. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 15:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)