Forum:Article Template:R. Lee Ermey

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Article Template:R. Lee Ermey

Note: This topic has been unedited for 3985 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

Seen those of Mr. T. and the like. Can one be made of R. Lee Ermey ? 65.173.105.125 06:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Nnnoooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo...!!!! etc. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:48, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh! --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 18:36, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

		"Gunnery Sargent R. Lee Ermey does not like this article!"
	What is this article's major malfunction Private Pyle?
	Private Pyle this article is sheeeeeiiittt! Now drop and give me 300 push-ups by rewriting it.

Sigh. And we just made the rewrite template nicer and less memey, too. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 20:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

It's TERRIBLE isn't it? I'm going to go cut myself. Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:16, 24 March 2007 (UTC) Eh?

So Charlie Brown and the pathetic Christmas Tree isn't a meme by itself? What good is a new age touching feely rewrite tag if it doesn't actually motive anyone to rewrite the article? I mean it is the only rewrite tag that makes you feel good about yourself for writing crap, were the Simon and Ermey rewrite tags make you want to rewrite the page because you feel bad about writing crap and want to do better. Here is the Simon rewrite: --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 04:51, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

We did kind of decide this already - although if you can think of a good 30 day warning for the new rewrite tag then that would be helpful. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:21, 25 March 2007 (UTC)