Boobpedia

Much as flightless birds are used to promote operating systems, this bluefoot is the avatar of the wiki devoted to boobies.

Boobpedia is a wiki devoted to the display and classification of boobs. It has a large collection of photographs that show a multitude of boobs, all in their natural habitat. Its content has near-universal appeal, catering to the entire Internet.

Categories

The site's extensive selection of boobs is neatly categorized:

Type, shape, and size

The boobs are categorized by type, shape, and size. There is something for fans of naturally big, teardrop, perky, softly hanging, or artificially enhanced boobs. The categorization is detailed, carefully distinguishing for instance between H-cup, H-metric cup, HH cup, and so on, to be educational for the boob enthusiast. More importantly, it shows men that their preferences are valid and women that their bodies are beautiful, no matter what they look like.

Model type

There are also model categories, covering porn stars, amateurs, celebrities, and "tasteful" nudes.

Body type

The most important categorization is by body type. Beautiful, shapely, or even massive boobs are less enticing to a man if they are stuck on a body type that doesn't appeal to him. Therefore, Boobpedia categorizes by body shape to please any taste and validate any preference, from "athletic" to "BBW".

This may be an exaggeration, plus that's probably not C. But you get the idea.

The athletic body is for the man who prefers women to be in shape, who demands physical perfection from his specimens. For many men, a pair of triple-D's on a well-worked-out body is just the thing to do his "push-ups" to.

Too skinny? No, it's totally valid to like this, and it's her choice to look that way.

The slim body doesn't require as much work on the part of the woman, just genetic luck with good metabolism. While this type is too skinny for many men, slap a pair of double-D's on a pogo-stick torso and it will be all good. Whether it is healthy or makes physical sense is unimportant.

An average gal for an average guy.

The average body type is the one that is found on most females and enjoyed by most men. If this is all you're interested in, you may want to rethink your sexuality to be more inclusive.

Chubbiness was more popular in the past, but is now confined to rarefied niches.

Chubby chasers love a little meat to grab hold of as they grab hold of their meat. Plus, many Boobpedia users believe that the appliances with optimum size, shape, and bounciness, tend to be carried on this type of vehicle.

Get the winch!

BBWs (Big, Beautiful Women) are at the other end of the scale. Boobpedia has tons of women of size for the men whose sophisticated fetish is to be crushed between tall mountains and deep valleys of bulging flesh. Though disgusting, it is important to remember that true beauty is on the inside — and measured in mouse clicks.

User uploads

Much like a wiki, the website enables any reader to become a contributor. Through the magic of the webcam, users can photograph their own boobs and upload their loads. Also like a wiki, these entries enter the "Amateur" category, as the contribution is not reimbursed. Nevertheless, contributors are wonderfully empowered by anonymous internet users getting off to their pictures, which often makes them feel valid and beautiful. Helpful on-site instructions make it easy to find the perfect exposure.

Still more like a wiki, the website induces participation by recognizing members for their contributions. There are monthly and annual "booby prizes."

Controversy

A typical user of the website, no different from anyone else, simply more interested in boobs.

Despite the website's wide variety, it only includes boobs in the C or larger sizes. Review blogs have criticized the website for thoughtlessly following patriarchal beauty standards. These blogs suggest that removing this restriction would let the patriarchy pleasure itself to all boob sizes.

Some^[who?] have called for a boycott of Boobpedia, saying that it promotes immorality and degrades women. They^[who?] are ignorant and need to educate themselves. It can't possibly influence or corrupt anyone, since everyone^[who?] wants to see delicious boobs, even if they don't know it yet. It's also great education for children. Furthermore, women featured on the site chose to appear there and cater to men's desires for no pay, so boycotting Boobpedia really means boycotting women's choices, an example of obvious misogyny.