Uncyclopedia talk:Votes for deletion/deleted

I don't understand...this article was hilarious if you've actually seen the show / read the manga. All it needed was a little cleanup.

67.166.176.206 21:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)Arsenic

Well, you see, apparently humor that requires some understanding of a subject to get does not belong in uncyclopedia. Uncyclopedia is about taking a subject and then describing it with random words being substituted with "Jesus", "Kitten Huffing" and "Zombie". --89.1.9.62 01:49, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Just because THE person didn't finds it funny, doesn't mean this article wasn't funny at all. All my friends and cousins finds it very funny, such as the idea that Lord Voldemort/Oscarmaru, the names, such as Gaara to Cigaara, and others. VFD polls are just lasts ONE DAY dammit! If its lasts ONE WEEK, the result would be different. So is this mean that other pages such as Kakashi are gonna experiencing the same thing? Sasuke and Itachi page is already gone. Uncyclopedia begun to disappoint me. BIG TIME. Reinn 05:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Personnally I feel it's deletion was unjustified, especially considering that the votes were about even and most of the reasons given for the deletion were essentially "I HATE ANIME" and variations. There was funny stuff, and there are far worse articles - but oh no, it's anime, therefore it's cruft on principle. Oh well, look at the bright side... the article was messy, and now it gets to start anew! Oh wait... look at the dark side... the redirect means it can't be recreated.

Presumably the next course of action would be to talk to an admin. We can't just have a big gaping Naruto-shaped whole in Uncyclopedia forever (well, we would if some people got their way). I'll see if I can get in contact with anyone. Feebas factor 01:55, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Is this deprecated?

I presume that CVP basically serves the same function as this page. What should we do about this page? --Pentium5dot1 06:23, 26 April 2008 (UTC)