Uncyclopedia talk:Departure of Fun/slots

Shouldn't the spin section be on a separate page, or at least at the top? It's kinda out of the way way down there... • Spang • ☃ • talk • 19:59, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Done. --User:Nintendorulez 20:34, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Also, the most likely option should be a completely random one, ie with individually random slot pictures. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 20:17, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

But then we couldn't rig it! It's not rigged. Um, we couldn't detect wins. --User:Nintendorulez 20:34, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

But that's the point, it just makes it easier to have lots of losing ones, and the rest "special" ones where they come up with a specific combination. You could set the weight of the random one to whatever you want. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 20:38, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

You can't do choose tags within choose tags. Hopefully that issue might be addressed in a later version of MediaWiki. And if we did just randomly generate the three individually, it'd be possible to get 3 of a kind. Then what? --User:Nintendorulez 21:59, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Possibilitys

How about we make it so you can get all possibilitys ok five different symbols so we get 125 possibilitys and we need the things for all of them. let us have a list.Djf2014 14:57, 12 January 2007 (UTC) O=oscar wilde 6=6 duh b=bannana phone g=grue a=apple c=cherry k=kitten

Possibitys available

1. Ao6
2. acb
3. 6co
4. boa
5. abc
6. acc
7. ggg
8. ooc
9. 666
10. cac
11. kkk

That sounds like waaaaaaay too much work. If you want to go ahead and script in every single possibility, minus winning combinations since it's rigged, then you do it. --User:Nintendorulez 00:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

No how about you CAN win but it is very unlikly

But that kills the whole joke of it being rigged. --User:Nintendorulez 17:36, 14 January 2007 (UTC)