Uncyclopedia talk:Bureaucrats

		This article was nominated for deletion on October 5, 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep.

Question

Why are you including the interview on the page? Just wondering--Sir Manforman 00:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

The first time I saw this article, I figured that some input from a bureaucrat would be needed if I was to get anywhere. An interview is a much easier way to get them to contribute, rather than saying "I need help with writing this article. Could you please go edit in something funny?" It's a world of difference. Plus, I was planning on having the input of multiple bureaucrats. Unfortunately, Rcmurphy was the only one to respond to my query, so i'm not at all surprised you asked me this. Conniving 00:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm sure another bureacrat will respond to your query. Remember to be patient--Sir Manforman 01:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Seems unlikely. But if anyone else were to respond, it would be Flammable KUN. I think. Conniving 13:12, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

You should try the IRC. Sometimes Flammable or Rc will be on, if you're fishing for ideas from actual 'crats. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:18, Oct 7

Also, when you're done, I'd reccomend sumbitting to Pee Review, there's room for improvement--Sir Manforman 16:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Okay, but i'd rather the VFD thing were taken off first. Submitting a VFD article to this looks bad. Conniving 17:12, 7 October 2007 (UTC)