UnNews talk:Old Faithful quits

This article could benefit from losing all UnNews references. It's rather clumsily worded, and the connection between the film and the "bulge" is not well or adequately explained. Sorry, I think this one is a dud. Cheers! Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 21:26, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

Zim, you're right. It took a major rewrite to fix, and I hope it's OK now. I think the headline should be "Yellowstone's Old Faithful quits". BTW: Now I know how you want the headlines. I went back and corrected a bunch of the recent ones. What now? It's your call? Cheers!--Funnybony  22:33, Mar 11

Tell you what, Funnybony; put some more links in and I'll publish it. It's not great, but I can't fault you for lack of trying. Not up to lead story, though. Cheers! Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 00:11, March 12, 2010 (UTC)

Hi Zim, wow, I did a lot of work on this article User talk:Funnybony/Old Faithful On Strike, and I think it's just as good now as any others. I don't know how to change the TITLE, but I would prefer the title: Old Faithful quits. I dated it March 13, 2010 at the bottom, so it would be good to publish it tomorrow. Never mind feature. If it gets published some people will get a laugh, cause I did. Could you please publish this on the 13th, or tell me what to do? Thanks! Also, a blimp-sized hint well taken, so I'll cut way back. Too bad though. I told my 13 year old son UnNews wants me to stop. He said, "but how can you stop ideas?" So I told him an ancient Sanskrit verse, which translated says, "Alas! The creator forgot to impart perfume to gold; fruit to the sugarcane; flowers to the sandalwood tree; wealth to the learned; long life to the king; and non-envy in a listener?" --- Chanakya Niti Shastra. No sweat! Cheers!--Funnybony  13:05, Mar 12

Nice fixes, gentlemen. This article is now judged by me sufficient as a lead story. Cheers! Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 01:34, March 14, 2010 (UTC)