Talk:Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

It's horrible.--Ivanvz 21:15, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree. This is undirected, vaguely anachronistic noise. If you're going to overwrite my article then please don't replace it with garbage ;) --Lurgy 07:33, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't know why it simply isn't left as "prolific composer of muzak" myself. Even that is a compliment to the over-venerated,vacuous Myslivicek-filching little turd.92.0.153.212 10:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC) I think that's much better now. Even if I do say so myself92.0.153.212 01:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Dear oh dear.Looks like we've been visited by some humourless Mozart Fan92.0.158.154 11:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC) PHEW!! Sense has prevailed. Many thanks92.0.158.154 10:16, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

I sense a learning opportunity. When you see something like this, click the thing at the top of the page that says "history" and try to find the edit right before the humourless Moztard started editing. If you click on the date, it should show you what the article used to look like. From there, if you click "edit", it'll take you to the old version. Without changing anything, you can save it and it'll put back the old version. Happy reverting! --monika 10:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I did try to edit it back, but it kept saying there were inter-editing complexities involved and fought all my attempts off.Apage 14:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Sometimes it does that if you try to use the undo button. --monika 17:26, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Picture of Salzburg

Just thought I'd point out that the picture of Salzburg is really good. Props to the photographer!