Talk:Sweatshop

The Proofreading Service has proofreaded your article. Like it? Need more proofreading? Click here!

DerHindemith 03:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC) By the way, I've proofread a considerable amount of detritus on uncyclopedia, and may I say that not only was this portion of uncyclopedia stunningly well-written, but it was mostly free of grammatical errors. It was as if the writer actually looked over what he had written before posting it. I wait with bated breath the children's section and its flawless grammar and syntax.

Thanks for looking over the article. I hate to disappoint, but there isn't going to be a children's section. The "under construction" thing was intended as my way of showing that the site was made using sweatshop labour. Also, notice that it's a "children" section, not "childswear". I'm aware that that joke is too subtle for my own good, but I didn't want to actually write that subpage. I might have to expand on the joke. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  16:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Cake, Is it a lie?

Would it be too fad/même based to insert a foot note noting that the cake is a lie? Hmmm...no article on the game Portal to link to anyway, yet... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.157.52.195 (talk • contribs)

I have no idea what you're talking about, which would make me feel that you should leave it be. As a general rule, it's best to avoid memes. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  11:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

WOW. That was like the perfect article, subtle, satirical and proving a point. I could only ever dream of writing one that good in some strange dream where I am not thinking about naked wome- yeah. Sir DJ ~ Irreverent

Epicness

Damn, epic sweatshop article. Very well written.

Thanks. In case you didn't already notice, you can click the links on the right and explore the menswear, ladieswear sections etc. A few people have missed those in the past. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  17:35, January 5, 2011 (UTC)