Talk:Stephen Colbert/Archive 1

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Todo[edit]

This is article is stupid. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.13.125.118 (talk • contribs)

Still better than what it was before - Devanhoe 03:04, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

Discontinuities 'n' Stuff[edit]

Some stuff which could be reworked:

  • Origin - Stephen not only served under James T Kirk, he is directly related to William Shatner.
  • Controversies - name origin conflicts with previous.

This Article is completely Biased[edit]

It only talked about our lord and savior ClBRT from your 'scientific' point of veiw. Where is the creationist point of veiw as stated in the Bible!? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.74.23.236 (talk • contribs)

Make the Article More Right Winged[edit]

This at the moment is just stupid and it doesn't really make any sence. It would probably be better if there were heaps of pieces about how he is a mathematics master, all of the things that are dead to him, that all liberals are crazy morons, that he's infact politically neutral but often gets confused for a conservative. All that sort of stuff --Garda

To steve...[edit]

...change the motherfucking article god dammit —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.33.68.185 (talk • contribs)

if you want it there, put it! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.18.118.86 (talk • contribs)

This Article is Astounding[edit]

Oh my god, I completely agree about the Weird Al thing. I thought I was crazy. This RULES. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.9.31.77 (talk • contribs)

THIS IS SHIT[edit]

Objectively indisputably shit, shite, shi'ite and poo. I vote we delete the whole thing and make it good; at the very least ditch the Star Trek bollocks. Not everyone is a trekkie - I'd go so far as to say most people aren't a trekkie. So they won't think it's funny. They'll think it's fucking stupid. --poorsodI crave recognition 09:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Here, here. Quote spam and lists do not make a funny article, not to mention the dreadful Star Trek references. This needs steamrolled. Any takers? --El Jefé de Pancho 07:08, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

job[edit]

why is colbert's occupation as a korean pop sensation not put on this —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.212.201.67 (talk • contribs)

Retrieved from "https://uncyclopedia.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Stephen_Colbert/Archive_1&oldid=2756646"