Talk:Moon hoax

Don't put a conspiracy tag on here. Not every article on Uncyclopedia needs to be homogenized by the same repetitive old tags.

I wonder if the Preamble should go above the contents? Thing is, I'm very fond of the title "Preamble", so I'm hesitant to do so.

I would've written a sort of conclusion, along the lines of 'the whole thing is completely stupid, you utter butt-munching gutter-crawling pond life', continuing my very avant-garde, postmodern and altogether inspired (I'm so modest and unpretentious) theme of insulting the reader, as well as citing some comically dubious scientists and what they have to say about the issue, etc etc, but I've been writing this for hours (not non-stop - I had breaks for food and lectures [not sleep {the pictures took the longest and they turned out crap, I wanted the astronaut to look painted on but he's just a bit... weird. Oh well, they're still pretty funny, especially the 'moonular erosion' one.}]) and I'm not in the mood for it right now. I need to recharge myself. Maybe someone else will do it. Time for coffee. --Carlos the Mean 13:58, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Ah, I reformatted it so the intro looks more Wikipedia-like before reading the above! Put it back if you like - David Gerard 14:58, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Don't worry, I keep forgetting that this site is supposed to look like Wikipedia :-/ --Carlos the Mean 23:11, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

The "moon landing" article is done a little more tastefully, i believe.