Talk:Jackson Pollock

• Against. Definitely funny in spots, but the random wackiness gets tiresome as you go on. --So So 07:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  • comment would it make sense to cut all of section 3, or cut it down to a single paragraph?

I took the Jackson Pollock approach to writing this article, somewhat. I'm happy with the results. I like how it's completely all over the place. Some people won't, but I'm OK with that. It was intended to be more than a little random. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Reread it and changed my mind. (see VFH page) --So So 18:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

recent

i know it's post-feature now but in the uk news recently,

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2435366,00.html?CMP=KNC-LBN&HBX_OU=50&q=jackson+pollock

[[1]] this pollock sold for $140million, making it most expensive painting ever. surely this could be included, someways - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Maybe. If you can think of a way to fit it in there, by all means go ahead. I just don't know exactly where it would go. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Just throw it in at random...? --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:40, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, thats exactly what we need, more random Pollocks..... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

the picture

Fyi, because this article has been featured, and no one bothered to freakin' tell me, I just thought I'd mention that I found that Pollock, and grafittied it in MS Paint. That's MY work that's all over that bugger. :) probably as "famous" as I'll ever get on here outside of the chatroom. BTW I love the way you used it repeatedly. Honestly. made me crack a molar smiling so hard. --Sharkbait1986 16:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)