Talk:Brevity

That's deep

We should feature this page, because I am brevity...--Wit (tawk) 06:31, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Support.

This should be featured immediately. --General Insineratehymn 20:04, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

I've put it up there, be ready for it to be gone from there soon (anyone who wants to edit the template can).--<<>> 00:46, 13 August 2008 (UTC)

Why isn't brevity wit anymore?

I'm confused? Clarify why wit isn't there in white text anymore.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 02:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I assumed it was only there in the first place to make the page not a dead end - a job that Template:deadend2 does equally well. I mean, surely we either wanted it on the page or we didn't - white links just complicate matters... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 02:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

I thought it had some meaning or is a joke, why else is such a short page allowed to exist?--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 02:50, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

The joke of brevity is just that it is short. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Ohhhhh - of course! Revert edits by self, having just realised this is even more genius than I thought. At least if words have souls... -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Wha? Why is the stuff in white back? BTW, shouldn't the article explain itself in as few words as possible without not saying anything? I know what it's supposed to be, but....fuck, now I'm just rambling.Barcode711 23:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Nah, it's self-referential, just like an article on morse in morse code - I know this is supposed to be a "content-free" encyclopedia, but then all the pages could just as well be filled with random text :) (at least that page is "content-light" heh) 131.130.121.106 22:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)