Forum:Quick question about VFP

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Quick question about VFP

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6391 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

I don't normally vote on VFP much (something about guilt and earning the right to criticize art by first making it yourself), but I've stopped by there and I often see a number of unclear votes. For instance, there are currently several votes that are unclear and are causing admins to have to look up the edit diffs and other tedious measures like that. Why is it that Template:Vote is not used on VFP? That would solve unclear voting problems. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 04:06, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Hmm... VFP is the only major voting list (as VFD and VFH, not user ellections) still not converted to the new style voting, separating fors and againsts. Time to upgrade it? -- herr doktor needsAbeam [scream!] 04:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Forgainst This is an interesting idea, and I may or may not be in support of it. --

(but) ~~Untrue~~ Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 06:41, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Maybe or perhaps could be the very same thing but with less a positive vibe. I elect you the official messiah of Forgainstinism, Let all of us Forgainstinate together -- Vosnul 20:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

for. People are silly. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

They are also strange, when you're a stranger. Also, faces seem ugly when you're alone. -- Sir Mhaille

(talk to me)

Indeed. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

To make things easier, let's just place the voting table for new nominations. -- herr doktor needsAbeam [scream!] 02:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Fnurdle. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Integrate the voting table with the VFP template. --~