Forum:Discographies

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > BHOP > Discographies
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6018 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over.

Ok. Am I the only one who is pissed off at these discographies people are making? People go on here to expect funny articles and many more edit them, hoping that they are the next George Carlin. One fine example of this is a band discography. This is crap made by people who can't put humor into paragraphs. So what do they do? They list things, hoping that their randomness is funny. Don't take me wrong. These things have great potential, but there is a lot of improvement to be made. Sure the metallica one was great until some asshole decided to delete it, but most are just shit. Take a look at the Heaven and Hell discography to see my point. They can make it better and all the person who made it did was put the song name's meaning. How is that funny? Either way, people should make a better attempt at this if they want it funny The preceding unsigned comment was added by Newvamp (talk • contribs)

Is nothing we do good enough for you? /me runs out of room crying. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
/me comforts Modusoperandi. Now look what you did! I hope your parents are proud! 'Cos they raised an asshole to match goatse! /me bursts into tears also. http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/User:sleepygamer sleepygamer Phencyclidine TALK STUFF 16:35, Dec 4
I do believe that you are part of "people", correct? So, instead of whining to us, most of whom have nothing to do with it and don't give a damn, why don't you improve them yourself? The people you're whining about won't see this forum topic. Therefore, instead of fixing it your own damn self or putting on the article's talk page where somebody that actually reads the article could see it, you come here and make another stupid forum topic whining about the quality of Uncyc while we, every day, try to improve this place to the best of our ability. Damn, this gets annoying. *deep breath* OK, I'm done now. Sig pic.PNG Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:18, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
In other words, "Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs fixin', please feel obligated to make whatever changes you feel are needed, (even though they'll probably be reverted 5 seconds later). Uncyclopedia is a wiki, so almost anyone can edit almost any article by almost simply following the edit link almost at the top. You don't even need to log in in most cases! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Uncyclopedia Cabal encourages you to be italic. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly, and your 6 month ban will fly by faster than you think. If you're not sure how editing works, check out proper wiki formatting, or use the sandbox to try out your vandalizing skills. " —Hinoa talk.kun 00:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Alright. I guess the answer to all problems is to bitch at others who bitch. I Edited the article and I'm not sure if I made it funny or better than it used to be and I'm sure my vandalism skill will get me banned if I keep it up.